Are hospital mergers good for the general public welfare? Those wanting to make the deals often suggest that there will be an improved quality of care overall. Melanie Evans of the Wall Street Journal reports that this claim has not proven true:
The quality of care at hospitals acquired during a recent wave of deal making got worse or stayed the same, new research found, a blow to a frequently cited rationale for tie-ups.
Hospital merger-and-acquisition activity has surged in recent years, with executives involved in transactions making the case that greater size will boost quality with new investments and yield other improvements as deal makers benefit from each others’ strengths.
Note: A subscription to the WSJ may be required to read the story.